WELCOME TO SEVAI - SOCIETY FOR EDUCATION VILLAGE ACTION AND IMPROVEMENT                                             Development is not Providing, but Promoting the Poor

HOME ABOUT US OBJECTIVES ACTIVITIES FOUNDER RURAL TECHNOLOGY AMOOR COTTAGES CONTACT US

·                Children projects

·                Agriculture

·                Education

·                IED / Differently Abled

·                Watershed  

·                Self Help Groups

·                Health & Sanitation

·                Shelter  Construction

·                Slum intervention

·                HIV/AIDS

·                Resource/training

·                Heifer projects

·                SEVAI Projects

·                Tsunami Response

·                Photo Gallery

·                Video Gallery

·                Media/Links

 

SEVAI RURAL TECHNOLGY CENTRE

 


Background

Since SEVAI was established, the SEVAI Rural Technology centre has been involved in upgrading traditional technologies as well as developing new ones that are versatile enough to meet the needs of rural communities.

 

The following criteria have been spelt out for deciding the technological advancement:

  • Technology should intervene to reduce and if possible eliminate drudgery.

  • Technology should be within the comprehension of the beneficiaries and suited to the rural situations existing in different parts of the country.

  • Technology should be such that would enable users to earn a living wage, interpreted as that comparable to the ruling agricultural wage in a particular area.

  • Technology should improve skill productivity and quality.

  • Technology should be within a low per capita investment.

  • Technology should use more and more of renewable sources of energy and less of depleting sources.

  • Technology should result in increased production and consequently additional employment though it may in the incidence; appear to throw away people away from their present occupation.

  • Technology in the final annotation should mean utilisation of newer range of materials available in the countryside and production of essential goods of need, opening fresh avenues of employment for the large masses of unskilled labour.

  • Technology does not begin and end with the improvement of tools, instruments, machines etc., but will also embrace techniques and diversification of production.

  • Technology is a continuous process of experimentation and hence will not remain static at any time.

  • Technology should retain the artisan in the village itself and should not be an instrument to motivate migration to urban areas.

SEVAI Rural Technology centre has been developed, to promote and disseminate the environmentally sound rural/appropriate technologies that emphasize the optimum uses of the locally available skills, means and resources in order to enhance the process of rural development thereby improving the livelihood of the rural population.
 

These days of increasing cost of instruction of the dream of owning a house particularly for low income and middle income family is becoming a difficult reality.
 

Hence it has become a necessity to adopt cost effective, innovative and environmental friendly housing technology for the construction of houses and buildings for enabling the common people to construct houses at affordable cost.
 

Building technology centre Established by SEVAI in Sirugamani is promoting Low Cost Housing Technologies and is providing its Technical Advice and Guidance services to the SHGs and target youth population for enabling them to construct the houses at an costeffective outlay
 

Promote and propagate environmentally sound rural appropriate technologies thereby strengthening the capability of rural poor communities’ especially empowering women to respond to their basic needs by creating better options and opportunities to improve the livelihood and upgrade the socio economic condition of the rural population.
 

Rural Technology Centre has been involved in upgrading traditional technologies as well as developing new ones that are versatile enough to meet the needs of rural communities. Some of these include solar powered cookers, improved latrines and water mains, briquettes made from unwanted biomass, and solar food dryers. Much of the technology is either locally developed or adapted to suit rural conditions.
 

RTC also goes to the local areas to teach people how to use the equipment on these technologies. Technologies are taken up for dissemination only after sufficient field trials for economic viability and environmental sustainability have been conducted.
 

Field level monitoring of our programs is undertaken by this organizational set up, which also ensures the continuity of our dissemination practices. The public is informed of our programs. Over the years, SEVAI has conducted a number of training programmes in the following areas.

  1. Installation of Smokeless Chulhas.

  2. Making of Pottery Liners for Smokeless Chulhas.

  3. Assembling of Electronic Ballast.

  4. Low-cost Construction Techniques.

  5. Rabbit Rearing

  6. Mushroom Cultivation

  7. Watershed Development Plan

  8. Drainage Mapping

  9. Participatory Resource Appraisal.

  10. Panchayath Resource Mapping.

  11. Preparation of Low-cost Teaching Learning Materials.

  12. Rural Sanitation.

  13. Awareness Creation on women’s health and Women Empowerment.

  14. Training Programme for Children’s Writers on Science.

  15. Training on Identification of Bio-diversity.

  16. Training on Peoples’ Planning at Panchayath Level.

  17. Training of Artisans & Craftsmen for Upgradation of Skills.

  18. Training on Sericulture Practices.

 

SEVAI Cost Effective Housing is a relative concept and has more to do with budgeting and it seeks to reduce the cost construction through better management, appropriate use of local materials, skills and technology but without sacrificing the performance and structure.
 

It needs to be emphasized that low cost housing does not mean houses constructed by utilizing cheap building materials of substandard quality.
 

A low cost house is designed and constructed as any other house with regard to foundation, structure, strength etc. the reduction in cost is achieved through effective utilization of locally available building materials and techniques that are durable, economical, accepted by users and not requiring costly maintenance, Economy is also achieved finishing and/implementing them in phases.
 

Further, it aims at increasing the efficiency of workers, minimizing wastage in design and space and applying good management practices, so that shelter can be provided at prices which people can afford.

 

SEVAI Building Cost
The building construction cost can be divided into two parts namely : Building material cost : 65 to 70 %

Labour cost : 65 to 70 %

The scope for effective means of reducing cost of construction lies with minimizing the quantity of building materials which consumes less energy. This is possible if one could follow a rational design procedure of the efficient use of materials. Cost of reduction is achieved by selection of more efficient material or by an improved design.
 

SEVAI Avenues for reducing cost of construction
The following are the avenues exist for reducing building construction cost:

Reduce plinth area by using thinner wall concept.Ex.15 cms thick solid concrete block wall.

Use locally available material in an innovative from like soil cement blocks in place of burnt brick.

 

 

Use an energy efficiency material which consumes less energy like concrete block in place of burnt brick.

Use environmentally friendly materials which are substitute for conventional building components like use R.C.C. Door and window frames in place of wooden frames. Preplan every component of a house and rationalize the design procedure for reducing the size of the component in the building.

 

Planning each and every component of a house the wastage of materials due to demolition of the unplanned component of the house can be avoided. Each component of the house shall be checked whether if it's necessary, if it is not necessary, then that component should not be used.


Cost reduction is possible by eliminating redundant components. Ex: Avoid plastering the walls, eliminating the use of plinth slabs in the foundation. Accept lower quality finishes like exposed brick work without plastering. Reducing standards -providing jelly work in place of  windows, no plinth concrete
 

SEVAI Cost reduction through adhoc methods
Foundation
Normally the foundation cost comes to about 10 to 15% of the total building and usually foundation depth of 3 to 4 ft. is adopted for single or double store building and usually foundation depth of 3 to 4 ft. is adopted for single or double store building and also the concrete bed of 6"(15 Cms.) is used for the foundation which could be avoided. It is recommended to adopt a foundation depth of 2 ft.(0.6m) for normal soil like gravely soil, red soils etc., and use the uncoursed rubble masonry with the bond stones and good packing. Similarly the foundation width is rationalized to 2 ft. 0.6m).To avoid cracks formation in foundation the masonry shall be thoroughly packed with cement mortar of 1:8 boulders and bond stones at regular intervals. It is further suggested adopt arch foundation in ordinary soil for effecting reduction in construction cost up to 40%.This kind of foundation will help in bridging the loose pockets of soil which occurs along the foundation. In the case black cotton and other soft soils it is recommend to use under ream pile foundation which saves about 20 to 25% in cost over the conventional method of construction.
 

Plinth
It is suggested to adopt 1 ft. height above ground level for the plinth and may be constructed with a cement mortar of 1:6. The plinth slab of 4 to 6" which is normally adopted can be avoided and in its place brickon edge can be used for reducing the cost. By adopting this procedure the cost of plinth foundation can be reduced by about 35 to 50%.It is necessary to take precaution of providing impervious blanket like concrete slabs or stone slabs all round the building for enabling to reduce erosion of soil and thereby avoiding exposure of foundation surface and crack formation.


Walling


Wall thickness of 6 to 9" is recommended for adoption in the construction of walls all-round the building and 41/2 " for inside walls. It is suggested to use burnt bricks which are immersed in water for 24 hours and then shall be used for the walls

 

Rat - trap bond wall


It is a cavity wall construction with added advantage of thermal comfort and reduction in the quantity of bricks required for masonry work. By adopting this method of bonding of brick masonry compared to traditional English or Flemish bond masonry, it is possible to reduce in the material cost of bricks by 25% and about 10to 15% in the masonry cost. By adopting rat-trap bond method one can create aesthetically pleasing wall surface and plastering can be avoided.
 

Concrete block walling
In view of high energy consumption by burnt brick it is suggested to use concrete block (block hollow and solid) which consumes about only 1/3 of the energy of the burnt bricks in its production. By using concrete block masonry the wall thickness can be reduced from 20 cms to 15 Cms. Concrete block masonry saves mortar consumption, speedy construction of 10 to 25% can be achieved.
 

Soil cement block technology


It is an alternative method of construction of walls using soil cement blocks in place of burnt bricks masonry. It is an energy efficient method of construction where soil mixed with 5% and above cement and pressed in hand operated machine and cured well and then used in the masonry. This masonry doesn't require plastering on both sides of the wall. The overall economy that could be achieved with the soil cement technology is about 15 to 20% compared to conventional method of construction.
 

Doors and windows
It is suggested not to use wood for doors and windows and in its place concrete or steel section frames shall be used for achieving saving in cost up to 30 to 40%.Similiarly for shutters commercially available block boards, fibre or wooden practical boards etc., shall be used for reducing the cost by about 25%.By adopting brick jelly work and precast components effective ventilation could be provided to the building and also the construction cost could be saved up to 50% over the window components.
 

Lintals and Chajjas
The traditional R.C.C. lintels which are costly can be replaced by brick arches for small spans and save construction cost up to 30 to 40% over the traditional method of construction. By adopting arches of different shapes a good architectural pleasing appearance can be given to the external wall surfaces of the brick masonry.

 

Roofing Normally 5"(12.5 cms) thick R.C.C. slabs is used for roofing of residential buildings. By adopting rationally designed insitu construction practices like filler slab and precast elements the construction cost of roofing can be reduced by about 20 to 25%.
 

Filler slabs
are normal RCC slabs where bottom half (tension) concrete portions are replaced by filler materials such as bricks, tiles, cellular concrete blocks, etc., These filler materials are so placed as not to compromise structural strength, result in replacing unwanted and nonfunctional tension concrete, thus resulting in economy. These are safe, sound and provide aesthetically pleasing pattern ceilings and also need no plaster.
 

Jack arch roof/floor
are easy to construct, save on cement and steel, are more appropriate in hot climates.
These can be constructed using compressed earth blocks also as alternative to bricks for
further economy.
 

Ferro cement channel/shell unit
provide an economic solution to RCC slab by providing 30 to 40% cost reduction on floor/roof unit over RCC slabs without compromising the strength. These being precast, constructions are speedy, economical due to avoidance of shuttering and facilitate quality control.
 

Finishing Work
The cost of finishing items like sanitary, electricity, painting etc., varies depending upon the type and quality of products used in the building and its cost reduction is left to the individual choice and liking.
 

 

Conclusion
The above list of suggestion for reducing construction cost is of general nature and it varies depending upon the nature of the building to be constructed, budget of the owner, geographical location where the house is to be constructed, availability of the building material, good construction management practices etc. However it is necessary that good planning and design methods shall be adopted by utilizing the services of an experienced engineer or an architect for supervising the work, thereby achieving overall cost effectiveness to the extent of 25% in actual practice

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Website designed and Maintained by www.snchannel.com                                                                                                                                                                          Copyright 2010@SEVAI